Glossary entry

German term or phrase:

Antragsgegner(in)

English translation:

opponent (Antragsgegner), as opposed to petitioner (Antragsteller)

Added to glossary by David Wallace
Apr 22, 2004 23:30
20 yrs ago
8 viewers *
German term

Antragsgegner(in)

German to English Law/Patents Law: Patents, Trademarks, Copyright
Respondent (from glossary) doesn't sound right (at least in American English).
Here is the context:
Die Antragstellerin beantragt, den Beschluss zu bestätigen.
Die Antragsgegnerin beantragt, den Beschluss zurückzuweisen.

Antragstellerin = claimant (glossary)
Antragsgegnerin = respondent (glossary)

Are these terms interchangeable with plaintiff and defendant (Kläger und Beklagter)?
Thanks!

Discussion

Non-ProZ.com Apr 23, 2004:
Trademark case This is a trademark infringement case (i.e., a civil case).
KirstyMacC (X) Apr 23, 2004:
Is this a patents or injunction application etc. case? Parties' names also change.
Johanna Timm, PhD Apr 22, 2004:
Petitioner<> respondent is used in divorce proceedings
Kim Metzger Apr 22, 2004:
Is it a criminal or a civil case?

Proposed translations

+1
10 hrs
Selected

petitioner (Antragsteller) and opponent (Antragsgegner)

according to the Dictionary of Patent Terms (Klaften/Wittmann/Klos). As Kim says, "adverse party" is also a possibility for "Antragsgegner", but if your text relates to a patent dispute I would not use "applicant" for "Antragsteller", which is also given in the above dictionary.
Peer comment(s):

agree KirstyMacC (X) : Appicant for patents.
6 hrs
Thanks, Counsel. I'm assuming that patent law is the issue here, but maybe that's not correct.
Something went wrong...
4 KudoZ points awarded for this answer. Comment: "Thank you very much!"
+1
4 mins

adverse party

One possibility.

--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 6 mins (2004-04-22 23:36:45 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------

Antragssteller could be applicant, petitioner, petioning party
Reference:

Hamblock/Wessels

Peer comment(s):

agree Edward L. Crosby III : If it's a dispute, I'd use "petitioner". Your "adverse party" confirmed in Klaften/Wittmann/Klos (see my note).
10 hrs
Something went wrong...
1 hr

conter-claimant

See: PDF] United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit. Nos. 95-3377 to ...
File Format: PDF/Adobe Acrobat - View as HTML
... Woodman, Seaman Apprentice, Plaintiffs-Appellees, Cross-Appellants, v. UNITED
STATES of America, Defendant-Cross-Claimant-Counter-Claimant-Appellant-Cross ...
www.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions/ops/19953377.OPA.pdf - Similar pages
Something went wrong...
+1
10 hrs

Opponent

If you feed google with '"Patent law"; dispute; applicant; opponent', you will be offered 386 hits; I'm not going to claim they are all jake, but a good number of them look very convincing. OTOH, you can replace the "opponent" with "counter-claimant" etc., and see what is offered.
Peer comment(s):

agree Edward L. Crosby III : Guess I was typing when you posted.
3 mins
Something went wrong...
Term search
  • All of ProZ.com
  • Term search
  • Jobs
  • Forums
  • Multiple search