nie ma nic wspolnego z restraining order
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Restraint_order
i funkcjonuje rowniez pod nazwa freezing injunction
https://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/restrai...

--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 7 days (2022-09-16 02:31:55 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------

A restraint order is an order which has the effect of freezing the assets and bank accounts of the persons against whom it is directed, in consequence of a belief by the authorities that some crime has been committed from which a person has benefited financially.

A restraint order is therefore related to criminal investigations and criminal proceedings. It has some parallels to a Mareva injunction which might be obtained against a defendant in civil proceedings.
Mareva injunction = Asset Freezing
Asset freezing is a form of interim or interlocutory injunction which prevents a defendant to an action from dealing with or dissipating its assets so as to frustrate a potential judgment. It is widely recognised in other common law jurisdictions[1] and such orders can be made to have world-wide effect. It is variously construed as part of a court's inherent jurisdiction to restrain breaches of its process.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asset_freezing


--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 7 days (2022-09-16 02:43:06 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------

w sieci widze rowniez "zamrożenie mienia" (sic) oraz nieco lepsze, "zamrożenie wartosci majatkowych", i oczywiscie zamrożenie aktywow. Moim zdaniem zamrożenie jest ok w przypadku funduszy, kont czy papierow wartosciowych, natomiast w przypadku mienia, wybralabym jednak nakaz zabezpieczenia mienia