Glossary entry (derived from question below)
German term or phrase:
in Anspruch genommene
English translation:
person held liable
Added to glossary by
volgil
Oct 7, 2014 00:27
9 yrs ago
2 viewers *
German term
in Anspruch genommene
German to English
Law/Patents
Patents
patent litigation
Hi, this assumes the 'person' 'in Anspruch genommen' is the holder of the infringing goods? Not too sure how to phrase this. Thanks in advance
Er setzt voraus, dass der auf Vernichtung in Anspruch Genommene im Zeitpunkt der letzten mündlichen Verhandlung Besitzer und/oder Eigentümer nach dem Vorschriften des Bürgerlichen Gesetzbuches der Schutzrechtsverletzenden Erzeugnisse ist
Er setzt voraus, dass der auf Vernichtung in Anspruch Genommene im Zeitpunkt der letzten mündlichen Verhandlung Besitzer und/oder Eigentümer nach dem Vorschriften des Bürgerlichen Gesetzbuches der Schutzrechtsverletzenden Erzeugnisse ist
Proposed translations
(English)
| 3 +1 | person held liable |
Kim Metzger
|
| 3 +1 | the person against whom the claim (for revocation) [of a patent] was filed |
TechLawDC
|
Proposed translations
+1
27 mins
Kim Metzger
Mexico
Mexico
Native in English
Mexico
Committed to Quality and Service
Native in: English (Variant: US) 
Works in: German to English
Related KudoZ points
:
39
Selected
person held liable
I don't specialize in patents, but here's what I'd suggest:
dass der auf Vernichtung in Anspruch Genommene … Besitzer und/oder Eigentümer … der Schutzrechtsverletzenden Erzeugnisse ist
that the person held liable for destruction is the owner and/or holder of the products that infringed proprietary rights
dass der auf Vernichtung in Anspruch Genommene … Besitzer und/oder Eigentümer … der Schutzrechtsverletzenden Erzeugnisse ist
that the person held liable for destruction is the owner and/or holder of the products that infringed proprietary rights
4 KudoZ points awarded for this answer.
Comment: "Thank you "
+1
1 hr
the person against whom the claim (for revocation) [of a patent] was filed
It is assumed that the person against whom the claim for revocation [of a patent] was filed was, at the time of the last oral hearing, a possessor and/or owner of the infringing products, according to the Civil Code.
(Apparently there are two claims in this action. Party B has filed a claim for revocation of party A's patent, and moreover has filed another claim against A for infringement by A of a patent held by B.)
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 1 hr (2014-10-07 01:56:07 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
Alternatively: the party against whom the claim (for revocation) [of a patent] was filed.
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 1 hr (2014-10-07 02:01:02 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
Alternatively: the party against which the claim (for revocation) [of a patent] was filed.
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 13 hrs (2014-10-07 13:35:10 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
In light of Metzger comment: Vernichtung here evidently means destruction of the infringing products, not revocation of a patent. Therefore my answer is changed to:
the person (or party) against whom (or which) the claim for destruction [of the infringing products] was filed.
(Apparently there are two claims in this action. Party B has filed a claim for revocation of party A's patent, and moreover has filed another claim against A for infringement by A of a patent held by B.)
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 1 hr (2014-10-07 01:56:07 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
Alternatively: the party against whom the claim (for revocation) [of a patent] was filed.
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 1 hr (2014-10-07 02:01:02 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
Alternatively: the party against which the claim (for revocation) [of a patent] was filed.
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 13 hrs (2014-10-07 13:35:10 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
In light of Metzger comment: Vernichtung here evidently means destruction of the infringing products, not revocation of a patent. Therefore my answer is changed to:
the person (or party) against whom (or which) the claim for destruction [of the infringing products] was filed.
Peer comment(s):
| agree |
Kim Metzger
: http://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/patg/__140a.html - I'll go with your second solution: party against whom a claim has been filed
11 hrs
|
|
Danke. Vernichtung (am ehesten) = destruction (von der Zeugnisse).
|
Discussion